On 1/26/2022 11:16 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On 1/25/2022 6:20 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: >> On 1/21/22 11:38, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote: >> 1. Ratify without objection that "Hillary Rodham Clinton is a player." >> Ratification is at power 3.1 and overpowers the restriction on consent >> in Rule 869/48. > > This step doesn't work by explicit precedent, so this whole argument may > need repair. If I remember the precedent correctly (will dig for it > later), the power=3.1 rule explicitly says that ratification fails if it > "adds inconsistencies between gamestate and rules" and the CFJ precedent I > remember stated that ratifying a non-consenting person into playerhood > would create that kind of inconsistency, and fail. > > -G. >
It's CFJ 3583 that I was thinking of: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3583 (the ratification rule isn't quoted in that judgement but I checked and it was power=3.1 at the time).
