On 3/20/2022 6:58 PM, nix via agora-discussion wrote: > On 3/20/22 20:53, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote: >> On Mon, 2022-03-21 at 01:48 +0000, nix via agora-business wrote: >>> On 3/20/22 05:03, Aspen via agora-official wrote: >>>> ID Author(s) AI Title >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> 8655& Jason, nix 1.0 Restricted Petitions >>>> 8656& Jason 1.0 Mathematical de-notation >>> On both proposals I vote: FOR unless someone has voted unconditionally >>> against, in which case I unconditionally vote AGAINST. >> Is this a conditional vote, or a conditional action? >> >> If it's meant to be a conditional vote (and it looks like one), I don't >> think you can conditionally make an unconditional vote. >> >> -- >> ais523 >> > > It is intended to be a conditional vote. I see no reason it doesn't work > as such, but I agree the "unconditionally" part might not do anything. >
Since "unconditionally AGAINST" is not a valid vote, and R2127 explicitly requires resolving to valid votes, the "unconditionally" may have the effect of turning it into a PRESENT. -G.
