On 3/24/22 12:49, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote: > This should specify the order of the repeals – repealing two rules > without specifying the order doesn't work. (This is an important > mechanic, both for working out the resulting gamestate in cases where > it matters, and for catching accidental breakage that might repeal much > of the ruleset simultaneously.) True, this part is fixed in the upcoming revision thanks to some discord feedback. > I plan to vote against this proposal regardless, though; not only do I > think the Set economy is still functional, I'm very wary of proposals > to repeal the economy without putting a lot of thought into a viable > replacement. Historically, attempts to repeal the economy without > replacing it tend to cause Agora to fall into a multiple-month slump > (and we already just repealed Glitter). I think most people agree with the wariness overall. My thoughts are that this still leaves boatloads and stones, and there's 2 or 3 promising economic proposals floating around on list and in discord. At some point Sets has to move before those things happen.
I also have a small economic proposal planned for later. -- nix Herald
