On 4/13/2022 12:36 AM, Madrid via agora-business wrote:
> This gave me a stupid idea that likely doesn't work but I will try it
> anyways.
>
> I create the following contract called 'Glitter Grifting':
> {
> Any player CAN by announcement Award themselves X Glitter, where X is any
> adjective of the following list: {Red, Orange, Green, Emerald, Cyan, Blue,
> Magenta, Ultraviolet, Violet, Indigo, Platinum, Lime, White, Black,
> Transparent, Gray}. To do so is the following sequence of actions:
> - Join this Contract
> - Transfer all of your Coins to Madrid
> - Leave this Contract
> }
This is basically stopped by Rule 2519; that is, you can't consent by
saying magic hidden contract words "unknowingly". An attempt to join
using trigger words would be governed by:
4. it is reasonably clear from context that e wanted the action to
take place or assented to it taking place.
And "context" is the keyword here - if you just claim glitter because you
think glitter is still in the rules, the message context would make it
clear you don't consent. If you claim glitter while citing this contract
(and no other disclaimers etc.), you probably join. It's slippery like
all language of course - if enough people actually joined (citing the
contract) it could become slang enough to work on it's own. Not now, though.
-G.
