On Mon, 2023-02-20 at 00:48 +0000, nix via agora-business wrote: > On 2/19/23 18:03, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote: > > If i have at least 94 points and less than 100 points, I increase > > my score > > by 6 by paying a fee of 1 snail stamp, 1 madrid stamp, and 1 aspen > > stamp. > > (I believe this one goes through, and not the next one.) > > If the above changes snail's score, I consent to and join a contract > called "Condition A Worked" with the following text:
For the record, I still really hate this sort of conditional action, and am not convinced it should be allowed – it can sometimes be used to reduce uncertainty about the gamestate, but it has a tendency to make it expand instead. It is often (usually?) possible to get the same effect by taking an action unconditionally in such a way that it will fail if the relevant conditions aren't met (although it wouldn't have been possible for the above score win attempt), with a Truthiness disclaimer explaining that it will fail if you're wrong about the gamestate. I've been using that technique in preference to conditional actions, where possible. -- ais523
