On Mon, 2023-04-17 at 02:01 +0200, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote: > On Monday, April 17, 2023, ais523 via agora-business < > agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > (Disclaimer: I'm attempting a counterscam here without knowing if > > anyone's going to attempt the scam that I'm aiming to prevent. If no > > revolution is happening, I don't have 100 radiance and so this message > > will end up having no net effect; my main purpose in sending this > > message is in case someone causes a revolution to happen sufficiently > > close to the start of the new week that nobody else would have time to > > react to the action in question unless they had already anticipated > > that it would be happening.) > > Crap
I think the revolution failed (although I might well have miscounted) – the last time I counted there were five participants and six were required. Thus the possiblity of a timing scam, where someone new joins it immediately before the start of the week, or someone becomes inactive immediately before the start of the week. If the revolution failed, there was no "race to claim victory" to lose. (Probably the radiance rule should be changed so that players don't lose radiance from someone else winning if they're already at 100, though, to avoid this sort of race occurring in the first place?) -- ais523