On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 4:16 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:

> On 4/29/23 02:20, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
> > I vote as follows:
> > 8960 ABSENT
> > 8961 FOR
> > 8962 FOR
> > 8963 FOR
> > 8964 AGAINST
> >
> > (also, I am now accepting bribes.)
>
>
> The vote on 8960 fails. It is not clear which decision is being
> referenced (there are two P8960's).
>
> --
> Janet Cobb
>
> Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
>
>
ABSENT is not a vote. Did you mean to reply to the one where I attempted to
vote FOR and referenced the context of nix who gave it the number 8960?

-- 
4st
Referee
Uncertified Bad Idea Generator

Reply via email to