On 5/13/23 15:47, juan via agora-discussion wrote: > Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2023-05-12 18:51]: >> In Agora, the rules are clear. The clock starts running when the >> infraction actually occurred, not when it was discovered or reasonably >> could have been discovered. > I'd argue this is a problem. If the investigation is to determine if there > was an infraction, we couldn't possibly start counting from “when the > infraction actually occurred”. We should instead count it from the > moment the *alledged* infraction occurred. > > If there is doubt whether there was an infraction, a CFJ must be called > and the deadline should be postponed (i.e., the Investigator can resolve > the pointed infraction by deferring to a CFJ). > > There's some serious issues with Rule 2478.
An investigation explicitly does not involve determining whether an infraction occurred. Only an actual, non-forgiven infraction can be investigated. Rule 2478 functions, though it does result in there being no duty for an investigator to respond to a purported noting of a non-infraction. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
