On 5/18/23 16:08, nix via agora-discussion wrote: > On 5/18/23 15:03, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote: >> I did call a CFJ on whether it created infractions, so I don't believe I >> violated no faking as I had included sufficient carefulness. :3 > Sufficient carefulness would be not investigating until the CFJ was > resolved, or your timer was almost up, at the very least. >
Whether it was sufficiently "misleading" and whether it met the "highest possible standard of care" standard for automatic forgiveness are different issues. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason