Yeah, the rules aren't particularly amenable to avoiding blindsides like this. Maybe there's a way to solve that, I'll think about it.
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 9:13 PM juan via agora-business < agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > nix via agora-business [2023-05-22 14:04]: > > That aside, I overall think you did a good job, and it's a well-reasoned > > judgment. I just don't agree with it, and I think the harm that these > > kinds of moon-logic readings due to Agora aggregates into our > > arbitrarily high learning curve, so I'm still going to try to overturn > it. > > > > I intend, with 2 support, to enter this judgment into moot. > > I support. > > While the judgment is (mostly) sound, it seems to me the favored reading > is so specific to Agora that for it to be upheld would require codifying > in the rules, *even if* it is game custom. Also, since it's not in the > rules, the most applicable way to overturn it is via CFJ. > > -- > juan >
