On 5/24/23 14:28, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote: > I vote AFFIRM on this decision. The reasoning may be "wrong", but we are > voting on the final outcome which is perfectly acceptable. That and just > because a reasoning is hasty or simple doesn't determine that the reasoning > is wrong. Finally, the judgement almost seems to read "ok this mechanic and > reading is on the way out" but being unable to represent that in a > judgement, Yachay resorted to what e could. A future case can use this case > if it comes up to determine the final outcome.
I strongly disagree with "we are voting on the final outcome". The reasoning is what matters for building consensus, and the reasoning is what matters for future cases. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
