On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 5:11 PM nix via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 10/20/23 17:09, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 4:46 PM ais523 via agora-discussion < > > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 2023-10-20 at 16:37 -0500, secretsnail9 via agora-business > >> wrote: > >>> I deny this CoE. The proposals were not submitted. You said "I submit > the > >>> following 3 proposals" and proceeded to list 4 proposals, so the action > >> was > >>> not clearly and unambiguously specified as required for by-announcement > >>> actions. > >> > >> Doesn't "following 3" unambiguously specify the next 3 proposals to > >> appear in the message? > >> > >> The main ambiguity is as to whether the fourth proposal was also > >> submitted via specifying it in the message, without a speech action > >> specifically saying so. > >> > >> -- > >> ais523 > >> > > > > There's 4 following proposals, though, and it doesn't specify which 3 of > > them are to be submitted. CFJ time? > > -- > > snail > > "The following three" would seem to me to be the immediate three following. > > -- > nix > > This seems about the same as changing a rule by saying "Add the following sentence: Things are a currency. Things are tracked by the Thinger." Which would fail to do anything because "any ambiguity" is present (I think this has been held before). There's the same ambiguity here. -- snail
