On Sun, 2024-02-25 at 13:41 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote: > 4st wrote: > > > The Geologist isn't real, and there are no crystals. If they do exist, it > > would look like this: > > Geologist Weekly: > > Snail owns Crystal 2463 with size 2. > > Snail owns Crystal 2659 with size 2. > > Snail owns Crystal 2451 with size 2. > > > > Murphy owns Crystal 2642 with size 2. > > > > 4st owns Crystal 2685, with size 1. > > 4st owns Crystal 1607, with size 3. > > 4st owns Crystal 106, with size 3. > > > > Janet owns Crystal 869, with size 3. > > Janet owns Crystal 2201, with size 3. > > > > Per the 18th February SLR, 133 rules are enacted. > > > > Changes: > > None. > > This is a Claim of Error, just to ensure that this quasi-report doesn't > self-ratify. (I'm pretty sure it wouldn't anyway, because it doesn't > purport to be the Geologist's report; instead, it purports that no such > office or report exists, then provides explicitly hypothetical data for > what it would look like if it did.)
It isn't a (valid) Claim of Error: those have to "explain[] the scope and nature of a perceived error" and you didn't. (Also, making a claim of error is an action by announcement nowadays: so I suspect this also failed on the grounds of "you didn't say you were making a claim of error, you just stated that the message was a claim of error".) -- ais523