On Sun, 2024-02-25 at 13:41 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> 4st wrote:
> 
> > The Geologist isn't real, and there are no crystals. If they do exist, it
> > would look like this:
> > Geologist Weekly:
> > Snail owns Crystal 2463 with size 2.
> > Snail owns Crystal 2659 with size 2.
> > Snail owns Crystal 2451 with size 2.
> > 
> > Murphy owns Crystal 2642 with size 2.
> > 
> > 4st owns Crystal 2685, with size 1.
> > 4st owns Crystal 1607, with size 3.
> > 4st owns Crystal 106, with size 3.
> > 
> > Janet owns Crystal 869, with size 3.
> > Janet owns Crystal 2201, with size 3.
> > 
> > Per the 18th February SLR, 133 rules are enacted.
> > 
> > Changes:
> > None.
> 
> This is a Claim of Error, just to ensure that this quasi-report doesn't
> self-ratify. (I'm pretty sure it wouldn't anyway, because it doesn't
> purport to be the Geologist's report; instead, it purports that no such
> office or report exists, then provides explicitly hypothetical data for
> what it would look like if it did.)

It isn't a (valid) Claim of Error: those have to "explain[] the scope
and nature of a perceived error" and you didn't. (Also, making a claim
of error is an action by announcement nowadays: so I suspect this also
failed on the grounds of "you didn't say you were making a claim of
error, you just stated that the message was a claim of error".)

-- 
ais523

Reply via email to