On Sun, 2024-03-10 at 12:46 -0700, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote: > Aris wrote: > > > Erm... that CFJ doesn't do what you want it to. CFJs are supposed to be > > statements, not questions, and interpreting something out of context is > > different from interpreting it in context. > > At one point we did legislate that, for CFJs asking yes/no questions, a > judgement of TRUE/FALSE is appropriate if the answer is yes/no > (respectively). Is it worth bringing that back?
I suspect that it isn't – this doesn't happen often enough to make it worth the additional rules complexity, and the consequences of getting it wrong are pretty small/minor and easily fixed. -- ais523
