On 3/9/24 18:51, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote: > I grant myself a welcome package. > > I don't think i've gotten one yet. > > CFJ: snail was granted a stamp in this message. > > arguments for TRUE: > When i registered, i was granted some assets that did not include a > stamp of my own type. So, since a welcome package is a set of assets > containing one stamp of my own type, i never received one, and thus > the grant in this message succeeded. The rule doesn't really track the > previous "welcome package" because it's no longer a welcome package as > defined by the rules. If anyone had tried this before and we assumed > it failed, that'd be a point for game custom, but it seems like nobody > has so it's free game! Since you can only do it once, it's fun and > good for the game, and it isn't exactly anti-common sense. Now i just > hope there's no precedence otherwise. > > arguments for FALSE: > I have at one point received a snail stamp from a wealth dream. If > that counts as receiving a welcome package, then it's FALSE. But that > seems to go against the intent of the rule and could break things. > -- > snail
Gratuitous: I think R1586 (Definition and Continuity of Entities) is relevant here. Several CFJs try to address similar questions, maybe most recently CFJ 4018. -- nix
