On 3/12/24 18:48, nix via agora-discussion wrote: > This is related to CFJ 4072, but you don't need to be familiar with all > of the arguments there. > > I just want everyone's reading on one (crucial) element. R105 requires > an "unambiguous and clear specification of the method to be used for > changing the rule". For rule changes in proposals, what would you say is > "the method", according to the rules? What would be a 1 sentence > "unambiguous and clear specification" of that method? >
"The proposal being adopted and taking effect." -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
