I wrote: > Maybe I'm misreading it, but R2127 sounds like it only allows for > if-then, not if-then-else, conditional votes. In fact, it explicitly > prescribes that the "else" is always PRESENT:
Sorry, ignore my previous message: I'm an idiot. I just realized that another part of R2127 has an explicit example with if-then-else: << Any vote which is clearly expressed as a conditional, e.g. "FOR if <X> is true, AGAINST otherwise", is a valid conditional vote that evaluates as specified. >> Best, msh210
