I assume Promotor.
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the eligible
voters are the active first-class players at the time of this
distribution, the vote collector is the Assessor, and the valid
options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote). Then, I
assign each listed proposal the ID number specified under "NUM".
I resign Promotor.
Pool report: The Proposal Pool is empty.
NUM AI AUTHOR TITLE
7267 1 G. Still Crazy after all these Years
7268 3 G. allow secret votes
7269 2 FKA441344 not funny anymore
###########################################################################
Proposal 7267 (AI=1, Ordinary) by G.
Still Crazy after all these Years
Enact the following Rule, Insanity Clause, power-1:
An Proposal is Insane, if it contains no minuscule letter.
(That is the opposite of CAPITAL, for those who know not
better.)
For such a Proposal, until the Voting Period has ended:
there shall be no discussing Votes, or this Rule has been
bended.
Nor shall a Player Vote in public, and its Chamber is the
Star.
So the Votes are unknown to others, no matter who they are.
And should a Player split eir votes 'tween FOR and
AGAINST like crazy,
E will annoy Assessors (who are known for being lazy)
So should eir votes cast differ from each other, this Rule's
broke,
With the breaker being the voting Player, as sure as if e'd
spoke.
And should such a Proposal's Voting Period begin,
but no one Votes FOR it, the Proposer shall Win.
[Note: it doesn't work, because private votes are not votes.]
###########################################################################
Proposal 7268 (AI=3, Ordinary) by G.
allow secret votes
Amend Rule 1950 (Decisions with Adoption Indices) by replacing:
with values Ordinary (default) and Democratic.
with:
with values Ordinary (default), Democratic, and Star.
[Yes, this makes Star Chamber proposals have the same voting
levels as Democratic proposals. Can make other rules later.]
Amend Rule 683 (Voting on Agoran Decisions) by replacing:
An eligible voter on a particular Agoran decision submits a
ballot to the vote collector by publishing a valid notice
indicating which one of the available options e selects. To be
valid, the ballot must satisfy the following conditions:
with:
An eligible voter on a particular Agoran decision submits a
ballot to the vote collector by either:
(1) publishing a valid notice indicating which one of the
available options e selects; or
(2) if and only if the decision is in Star Chamber, sending
such a notice to the vote collector using the means of
contact tracked by the Registrar.
To be valid, the ballot must satisfy the following conditions:
[I.E. no voting to Discussion, or on IRC, etc. Unless of course
a Vote Collector makes that the official means of contacting em!
Retractions must still be public; however they can probably be
relatively secretive, e.g. "I retract the most recent vote I sent
to the Assessor".]
Amend Rule 683 (Voting on Agoran Decisions) by appending:
If a decision is in the Star Chamber, then if its vote
collector publicly or privately reveals the existence or
value of a ballot submitted to em for that decision before
the decision's voting period has ended, e commits the Class-6
crime of Opening the Chamber Doors. E MAY reveal the number
of ballots received if the rules require (e.g. for announcing
the extension or ending of a voting period).
###########################################################################
Proposal 7269 (AI=2, Ordinary) by FKA441344, G.
Not clever anymore
Amend Rule 869 (How to Join and Leave Agora) by appending:
Initiating a frivolous judicial case on the success or
failure of a registration attempt is the Class-3 crime
of Hazing.
[Purposefully adding "frivolous" to the ruleset undefined for
the pleasure of future precedent-setting]
