[Note: G. and I have formed an informal agreement to split the Arbitor
workload, in which I do judge assignment and the Arbitor's other rule-
defined requirements, and e maintains the historical records. These
assignments respect requests from players to be assigned to specific
CFJs.]

<https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3465>
CFJ 3465 is "If Proposal 7821 were resolved right now, the outcome
would be ADOPTED.", called by Alexis. I deputise for the Arbitor to
assign this CFJ to nichdel (the assignment is well over 14 days late). 

<https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3466>
CFJ 3466 is "It is possible to ratify an Agoran Credit Union report,
and have the ratification have some effect.", called by ais523. I
assign this CFJ to nichdel.

<https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3468>
CFJ 3468 is "It is possible for circumstances to exist under which is
possible to initiate a new Era by announcement.", called by ais523. I
assign this CFJ to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus.

<https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3468>
CFJ 3469 is "At least one Patent Title to be held by something other
than a person.", called by ais523 (whoops, it looks like I rather
screwed up the statement there...) I assign this CFJ to Publius
Scribonius Scholasticus.

CFJ 3473 is "On or around 05-Jan-17 08:07:23 UTC, o caused Agora to pay
10 Shinies to G.", called by G.. Because this CFJ is not currently
online, I reproduce the relevant discussion below:
{{{
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017, 15:36 Aris Merchant, <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >> there's nothing that says the "plus 10" can't be in a separate later 
>message,
> >> or that you can't do partial awards in general, as long as you get it all 
> >> in
> >> within 7 days.  For example, which of the following work, or don't work:
> >
> > Relevant addition.  This clause:
> >>      If Agora's Balance becomes 0 or less before every player is paid,
> >>      the Secretary SHALL continue to cause Agora to pay until every
> >>      player has been paid.
> >
> > on one hand implies that a single message with all transfers doesn't fail
> > because Agora runs out of money halfway through the message execution.  On
> > the other hand, it implies that the Secretary's duties may be partially
> > satisfied and still work ("continue  to cause", implying that it's a set of
> > separable transfers, that can be interrupted and re-started).
>
> I tend to be of the opinion that partial paying succeeds. It seems to
> be that generally when you authorize someone to pay out a certain
> amount of money, you also implicitly authorize them to pay out less
> than that amount. The authorization and the obligation are separate,
> so it should work. Even if that isn't so, the rule doesn't say
> anything about it all being required to happen in one message (as G.
> says), although accepting the latter without the former leads to the
> somewhat surprising conclusion that payments can retroactively fail
> (or, more sanely, that the payment is not final until complete). It
> would be interesting to see how a CFJ would go though.
> 
> What does everyone think about making this an automatic transaction,
> which the Secretary merely obliged to report it, perhaps in a self
> ratifying way? It would avoid this problem, and not enough things
> happen platonically. Oh, and just to mention the other proposed
> solution, I think a CoE would fail (payment happens once, except
> possibly with credit systems).
}}}
I remove Alexis as judge of this case, and assign it to Quazie.

<https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3479>
CFJ 3479 is "Agora's To-Do List is a proposal that was in the proposal
pool and has been pended.", called by Publius Scribonius Scholasticus.
I assign this CFJ to Sprocklem.

<https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3482>
CFJ 3482 is "Repealed Rule 2469 (Dictatorship) is an Instrument with
Power-3.", called by G. I remove Murphy as judge of this case, and
assign it to o.

<https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3486>
CFJ 3486 is "My heir switch is now set to Publius Scribonius
Scholasticus.", called by o. I assign this CFJ to Aris.

<https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3487>
CFJ 3487 is "I am not the Judge of CFJ 3481.", called by Aris. I assign
this CFJ to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus.

<https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3488>
CFJ 3488 is "I CAN assign a valid judgement to CFJ 3471 by
announcement.", called by G.. I assign this CFJ to Publius Scribonius
Scholasticus.

<https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3473>
CFJ 3489 is "At this time, AAaAA has not paid any Shinies to any
player whatsoever.", called by o. (G. suggested the unofficial
assignment of CFJ 3473 to this CFJ, but the number was already in use.)
I assign this CFJ to Aris.

List of players who I will currently consider assigning as judges (you
can place yourself on this list, or remove yourself from it, by
announcement):

ais523
o
nichdel
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
Aris
Sprocklem
Quazie

-- 
ais523
Arbitor

Reply via email to