I find CFJ 3468 to be trivially TRUE because a set of proposals could as has occurred amend the rule to remove ambiguity. However, given that this is not the spirit of the CFJ, I will also offer an explanation of why it is also TRUE with no rules amendments. I believe the two logical interpretations of "with Agoran Support" are "with the Support of Agora" and "with Agoran Consent". I further believe that the term "support" in this instance replies to making Agora a "supporter" as laid out in Rule 2124. I believe the easiest method for Agora to become a "supporter" would be by a proposal making it such for the specified action. After which to cover all of the bases, I believe Agoran Consent must be received. Under the rule at the type of the CFJ's calling, I believe a new era could be initiated by making Agora a "supporter" by proposal and then achieving Agoran Consent. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
