status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3497 (This document is informational only and contains no game actions).
============================== CFJ 3497 ============================== The rules forbid a player named 'no Player' from taking any action that requires posting to a public forum. ======================================================================== Caller: o Judge: Aris Judgement: FALSE ======================================================================== History: Called by o: 18 May 2017 Assigned to Aris: 19 May 2017 Judged FALSE by Aris: 01 Jun 2017 ======================================================================== Caller's Evidence: Rule 478/33 (Power=3) Fora Freedom of speech being essential for the healthy functioning of any non-Imperial nomic, it is hereby resolved that no Player shall be prohibited from participating in the Fora, nor shall any person create physical or technological obstacles that unduly favor some players' fora access over others. Publicity is a forum switch with values Public, Discussion, and Foreign (default), tracked by the Registrar. Changes to publicity are secured. The Registrar may change the publicity of a forum without objection as long as: (a) e sends eir announcement of intent to that forum; and (b) if the forum is to be made public, the announcement by which the Registrar makes that forum public is sent to all existing public fora. Each player should ensure e can receive messages via each public forum. A public message is a message sent via a public forum, or sent to all players and containing a clear designation of intent to be public. A rule can also designate that a part of one public message is considered a public message in its own right. A person "publishes" or "announces" something by sending a public message. Where the rules define an action that CAN be performed "by announcement", a person performs that action by unambiguously and clearly specifying the action and announcing that e performs it. Any action performed by sending a message is performed at the time date-stamped on that message. Actions in messages (including sub-messages) are performed in the order they appear in the message, unless otherwise specified. ======================================================================== Judge's Arguments: I was considering playing along with this, but frankly, given everything that's happened, I'm not in the mood. Even the caller has practically admitted that this CFJ is frivolous (the message was entitled "A little levity"). The only sensible reading of the rule is that "no Player shall be prohibited" means roughly "a player shall not be prohibited". This is so abundantly clear it isn't even worth talking about (see also common sense, affixed). Further, no evidence has been provided that a player named "no player" even existed at the time of the addition of that rule. Under the precedent set by CFJ 1520, the existence of such a player would be required for the reference to be complete. I judge this case FALSE. Additionally, for the initiation of a frivolous case, I (unofficially) sentence o to Shame. I realize we have a tradition of having such cases on occasion, but given the current judicial overload I think this is in bad taste at the moment. ========================================================================