On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: > I AP-CFJ, barring PSS, and doubting the self-ratifying claim (if any) that > Proposal 7981 took effect: The below-quoted message contains a > self-ratifying claim that Proposal 7981 took effect.
This is CFJ 3618. I assign it to ATMunn. > Arguments: The message clearly indicates that Proposal 7981 does not take > effect, but Rule 2034 does not provide that the self-ratifying claim can be > disclaimed in any way. Moreover, no other part of the message is > self-ratifying, so I think the disclaimer falls outside the scope of > self-ratification. Thus, the self-ratifying claim still exists. > > On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 at 21:25 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > Thank you for catching that, I thought it was only for committed authors. > > I publish the below revision: > > > > I resolve the decision(s) to adopt proposal(s) 7981 below. 7981 does not > > take effect because its author lost the election. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > [This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the > > following proposals. For each decision, the options available to > > Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FAILED QUORUM (!). If a > > decision's voting period is still ongoing, I end it immediately > > before resolving it and after resolving the previous decision.] > > > > ID Author(s) AI Title Pender Pend > > fee > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > 7981* P. Scribonius 1 History by Force OP OP > > > > | | 7981 | > > |--------+------+ > > |Alexis | FF | > > |Aris | F | > > |ATMunn | F | > > |Corona | F | > > |G. | F | > > |o | A | > > |PSS | F | > > |--------+------+ > > |F/A | 7/1 | > > |AI | 1.0 | > > |V | 7 | > > |Q | 4 | > > |P | T | > > > > > > //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > > > > Title: "History by Force" > > > > Author: PSS > > > > Co-author(s): > > > > AI: 1 > > > > ID: 7981 > > > > Enact a new Rule "Miscellaneous Herald Duties", with the following text: > > > > { > > > > The Herald SHALL in eir weekly report include an interesting Agoran > > > > fact and SHALL in eir monthly report include a short essay of any > > > > authorship, regarding an aspect of Agoran history. Any player > > > > publishing a thesis for a degree, related to Agoran history SHOULD > > > > offer a summary for publication in the Herald's monthly report. > > > > > > > > The Herald SHALL in eir monthly report publish, with reasonable > > > > effort, a summary of all theses written for the purpose of > > > > receiving degrees, regardless of whether a degree was awarded. > > > > The Herald SHOULD attempt to make theses available for reading. > > > > } > > > > //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > > > > I resolve the election for Herald as electing Corona. In the first round, > > Corona wins with 6 votes, the ballots were as follows: > > > > PSS: {PSS, Corona} > > > > ATMunn: {Corona, PSS} > > > > Alexis: 2x {Corona, PSS} > > > > G.: {PSS, Corona} > > > > Aris: {Corona, PSS} > > > > o: {Corona, PSS} > > ---- > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > On Nov 29, 2017, at 9:21 PM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Per Rule 2034, the proposal taking effect self-ratifies. But it didn't > > take > > > effect, as Corona won. > > > > > > On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 at 21:20 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > > > p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> But, I don't understand what the issue was. > > >> ---- > > >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>> On Nov 29, 2017, at 9:18 PM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Because the revision is probably self-ratifying of its own right, and > > so > > >> it > > >>> requires a second CoE to prevent that self-ratification. CoEs don't > > carry > > >>> over. > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 at 21:17 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > > >>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> So, why did you CoE the revision? > > >>>> > > >>>> On 11/29/2017 09:16 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > >>>>> No, there was the first one, then the revision. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 at 21:12 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > > >>>>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Not after the second one. Did I accidentally send multiple revisions > > >>>>>> after VJ Rada's CoE? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On 11/29/2017 09:10 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > >>>>>>> On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 at 21:08 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > > >>>>>>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Why? > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Because you published a new document purporting to be a decision > > >>>>>>> resolution. > > >>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> ---- > > >>>>>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> ---- > > >>>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > >> > > > > >