status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3880
(This document is informational only and contains no game actions).
=============================== CFJ 3880 ===============================
This is a CFJ.
==========================================================================
Caller: Trigon
Judge: ATMunn
Judgement: TRUE
==========================================================================
History:
Called by Trigon: 25 Aug 2020 20:29:58
Assigned to ATMunn: 30 Aug 2020 18:41:29
Judged TRUE by ATMunn: 07 Sep 2020 00:47:07
==========================================================================
Alleged calling message:
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2020-August/044696.html
Arbitor's Note:
If a judge finds that eir assigned CFJ is not a CFJ, common practice is to
leave it in the archives with its initial ID number (along with the not-
judgement) and not reassign the ID#, so it can be used as a handy reference
for any follow-up CFJs that might be called on the matter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge ATMunn's Arguments:
The only relevant piece of the rules here is the first paragraph of Rule
991:
Any person (the initiator) can initiate a Call for Judgement (CFJ,
syn. Judicial Case), specifying a statement to be inquired into by
announcement.
It seems reasonable to interpret the statement of "This is a CFJ" as
meaning "I initiate a CFJ with the statement 'This is a CFJ'". We allow
the format "CFJ: blah", and this is not that far off from that.
I judge CFJ 3880 TRUE.
==========================================================================
