PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW If you vote on a proposal, please edit this spreadsheet with your votes:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1F39OHtBlZlQ8XVccqKCFtP-DPuHz4wPnujxbxkCN3LI/edit?usp=sharing I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating a referendum on it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 5, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are conditional votes). ID Author(s) AI Title --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8980~ Yachay 1.0 Riding with training wheels 8981~ Janet, nix 2.0 Stone fixes 8982~ snail 2.0 Reward the Speaker! 8983~ Janet 1.0 Sacrilege 8984* nix, ais523 3.0 Clarifying Intentions The proposal pool contains the following proposals: ID Author(s) AI Title --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Legend: <ID>* : Democratic proposal. <ID>~ : Ordinary proposal. The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where the information shown below differs from the information shown above, the information shown above shall control. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8980 Title: Riding with training wheels Adoption Index: 1.0 Author: Yachay Co-author(s): /* Comment: This is intended to allow players, especially less fluent ones, to perform (by proxy) actions that they intend to do when they might mess up the exact wording that they'd need to use to do so. Or, at least, it adds an explicit flag for review of what they're trying to do and a request for notification if they've messed up. It's also intended to be very easy to use, you'd just need to add "I invoke" to a message and you're good to go.*/ Create the following rule at Power 1 with the title "Invocation": A player can Invoke by announcement. When a player Invokes in a message, an attempt to perform an action in that message is Invocable if all of the following is true: - Such an attempt has failed to perform an action or it would produce an effect other than what seems to be its intent. - Such an attempt is not older than 24 hours. - Nobody has Responded to that Invocation. Any player can Respond to the Invocation by acting on the Invoker's behalf to perform what reasonably would be the intended action of an Invocable attempt to perform an action. Players are ENCOURAGED to publicly make it known when an attempt to perform an action is Invocable, if it hasn't been already. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8981 Title: Stone fixes Adoption Index: 2.0 Author: Janet Co-author(s): nix Amend Rule 2645 by (as a single amendment) replacing "the Soul Stone is transferred" with "this stone is transferred", by replacing: "The Recursion Stone can be wielded" with "This stone can be wielded", and by replacing "the Anti-Equatorial Stone's mossiness" with "the wielded stone's mossiness". [Ensure that these stones don't break when used with the Recursion Stone.] Amend Rule 2642 by replacing the paragraph beginning "At the beginning of each week" with the following paragraph: { At the beginning of each week, a player has an active reach if e reached for a stone in the previous week and that stone is currently owned by Agora, and the stone reached for by the player with an active reach who has the highest Modified Rockiness is transferred to em. In a tie, the reached for by the tied player with an active reach who reached first in the previous week is transferred. When a player receives a stone in this way, eir Base Rockiness is set to 0. } [Ensure that stones aren't transferred between players due to reaching.] ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8982 Title: Reward the Speaker! Adoption Index: 2.0 Author: snail Co-author(s): Enact a new rule at power 2 with the title "Speaker's Strength" and the following text: { The Speaker's voting strength is increased by 1 for referenda on ordinary proposals. } ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8983 Title: Sacrilege Adoption Index: 1.0 Author: Janet Co-author(s): Repeal Rule 2680 ("Ritual Paper Dance"). ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8984 Title: Clarifying Intentions Adoption Index: 3.0 Author: nix Co-author(s): ais523 [The current wording seems to suggest that players should say something like "I intend to register." While effective, it's quite different than the conventional way of doing most actions. This version disambiguates that.] Amend R869 by replacing: An Unregistered person CAN (unless explicitly forbidden or prevented by the rules) register by publishing a message that indicates reasonably clearly and reasonably unambiguously that e intends to become a player at that time. No person can be a player if e is part of another player or another player is part of em. with: An Unregistered person CAN (unless explicitly forbidden or prevented by the rules) register by publishing a message that indicates reasonably clearly and reasonably unambiguously eir desire to become a player at that time (for example, by saying "I register"). No person can be a player if e is part of another player or another player is part of em. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// -- snail
