status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#4039 (This document is informational only and contains no game actions).
=============================== CFJ 4039 =============================== I currently own the recursion stone. ========================================================================== Caller: snail Judge: Murphy Judgement: FALSE ========================================================================== History: Called by snail: 01 Jun 2023 21:16:54 Assigned to Murphy: 04 Jun 2023 13:29:32 Judged FALSE by Murphy: 04 Jun 2023 20:26:20 ========================================================================== Caller's Evidence: snail wrote: > I wield the radiance stone. (This increases my radiance by 3.) > I reach for the Minty stone. > I wield the recursion stone as the soul stone, specifying the > anti-equatorial stone. > I wield the anti-equatorial stone. (This transfers the power stone to me.) - Recursion Stone (Monthly, 4): The Recursion Stone can be wielded once per month as if it had the power of any other stone of your choice. - Soul Stone (weekly, 3): When wielded, the Soul Stone is transferred to the owner of a different specified non-immune stone not owned by Agora, then that stone is transferred to the wielder. Caller's Arguments: Using the recursion stone as the soul stone seems to transfer the soul stone to the owner of the anti-equatorial stone, as that's what the rule says (the power of the soul stone, which is being copied, transfers the soul stone, not the recursion stone or perhaps "this stone"). But does it actually do that? If so, I own the recursion stone and ais523 now owns the soul stone. If not, my recursion stone was transferred to ais523. A real thinker, a conundrum, if you will. Will the practical reading prevail? Or the technical, textual one? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Judge Murphy's Arguments: Beokirby acquired the Recursion Stone on or about 2023-05-29, and still had it when the attempted actions listed in Caller's Evidence were attempted. I judge FALSE. To answer the intended question, though: The Recursion Stone's power is worded broadly; "as if it had the power", as opposed to "as if it had a copy of the power's text". Accordingly, I interpret that it also substitutes itself into any clause in which the power of the target stone references the target stone itself. This would result in a judgement of FALSE even if Beokirby had not acted. ==========================================================================