PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW If you vote on a proposal, please edit this spreadsheet with your votes:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1F39OHtBlZlQ8XVccqKCFtP-DPuHz4wPnujxbxkCN3LI/edit?usp=sharing I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating a referendum on it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 5, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are conditional votes). ID Author(s) AI Title --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9040~ Janet, ais523 1.0 Adoption AI security 9041* 4st, Murphy 3.0 Repeal 107 9042~ 4st, Murphy 1.0 Repeal 2464 9043~ 4st, Murphy 1.7 Repeal 2676 9044~ 4st, Murphy 2.0 Repeal 2573 9045* 4st, Murphy 3.0 Repeal 879 The proposal pool contains the following proposals: ID Author(s) AI Title --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Legend: <ID>* : Democratic proposal. <ID>~ : Ordinary proposal. The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where the information shown below differs from the information shown above, the information shown above shall control. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 9040 Title: Adoption AI security Adoption Index: 1.0 Author: Janet Co-authors: ais523 Amend Rule 1607 ("Distribution") by deleting the text ", or 1.0 if the proposal does not have one". [A proposal always has a numeric AI, so this clause can never be triggered. And, even if it could be triggered, this isn't the right behavior (AI 3 would be a more sensible default, but we don't add that here because it's impossible).] Amend Rule 106 ("Adopting Proposals") by replacing "its power is set to the minimum of four and its adoption index" with "its power is set to the minimum of four, the adoption index of the proposal, and the adoption index of the referendum". [Defend against any case where a proposal does not have an AI but the referendum does, or where the referendum has a lower AI than the proposal.] [Currently, these issues combine so that if there were somehow a proposal without an AI (which cannot exist not but has been possible in the past, according to ais523), it would be voted on at AI 1.0 but adopted at power 4; this fixes both: it would no longer be distributable, and if it were to take effect it would only take effect at power 1.] ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 9041 Title: Repeal 107 Adoption Index: 3.0 Author: 4st Co-authors: Murphy Repeal Rule 107 ("Initiating Agoran Decisions") ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 9042 Title: Repeal 2464 Adoption Index: 1.0 Author: 4st Co-authors: Murphy Repeal Rule 2464 ("Tournaments") ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 9043 Title: Repeal 2676 Adoption Index: 1.7 Author: 4st Co-authors: Murphy Repeal Rule 2676 ("Forgiveness") ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 9044 Title: Repeal 2573 Adoption Index: 2.0 Author: 4st Co-authors: Murphy Repeal Rule 2573 ("Impeachment") ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 9045 Title: Repeal 879 Adoption Index: 3.0 Author: 4st Co-authors: Murphy Repeal Rule 879 ("Quorum") ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// -- snail
