On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 22:19 +0100, Adam Thompson wrote:
> I'm afraid it's not such good news from the tiger side of things, I
> couldn't run the release you've compiled (not that unexpected as it
> was compiled on leopard), but I can't compile my own either.
> Following the steps, I can't get it to run zqcc, it says there is a
> segmentation fault. Have you updated the compilation scripts on
> launchpad?
Launchpad is up-to-date with my latest stuff here, yes.
If I was using XCode (or rather: if ZQuake used XCode) then Tiger
support would be automagical, even from Leopard. It should compile ZQCC
on its own fine, though. You could try deleting any zqcc binary that is
already there first. Can you find out exactly what is segfaulting, or
paste me the contents of the terminal window, or run
./compile-mod-tree > cmt.log 2> cmt.err
and send me cmt.log and cmt.err? I presume you're running on an Intel
Mac -- is that right?
> I also had to install one of the perl modules to get the start.pl script to
> run.
Which one? I thought I included the Config::Tiny one with AQ.
Just a sanity check... have you (1) installed XCode tools and done a
software update and (2) tried to compile zquake by going to
audioquake/zq-repo/zquake/ and typing make server && make gl (that last
one could be make sdl instead of make gl -- I can't currently remember,
but will be doing it on my PowerBook soon so will get back to you)?
You'll need to install the SDL package from MacPorts -- libsdl I believe
(sudo port install libsdl).
I should be able to get back to you with better instructions once I've
redone the process for PowerPC Leopard.
> That being said, well done for getting it working on leopard, hope
> everything goes well,
Thank you. Unfortunately I won't be able to access a Tiger box any time
soon, maybe ever, but I suspect we'll be able to work the problems out
and you could help us make a Tiger release. However, that probably
won't be until after the 5th of May. Thank you anyway for trying this
so promptly! Maybe in future you will be able to give feedback on it --
it will all still be taken into consideration.
I'll be checking here regularly anyway. However, don't feel under any
pressure to look into this so soon -- it's not your job to compile the
entire software stack before you can even start testing it :-).
best regards,
--
Matthew Tylee Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
AGRIP-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.agrip.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/agrip-discuss