Dear Listers, When comparing cross-validated results between Ordinary Kriging and a variety of Radial Basis Functions, is there a reason that the RBF cross-validation statistics (e.g. ME, MAE, RMSE) may not be unbiased?
Any references on this topic would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Dave ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Miller GIS Research Assistant The Macaulay Institute Craigiebuckler Aberdeen AB15 8QH tel: +44 (0) 1224 498200 (switchboard) ext. 2261 tel: +44 (0) 1224 498245 (direct dial option) ext. 2261 fax +44 (0) 1224 311556 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] websites: http://www.macaulay.ac.uk http://www.macaulay.ac.uk/LADSS/ladss.shtml -- Please note that the views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and do not necessarily represent the views of the Macaulay Institute. This email and any attachments are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the recipient(s) to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read, copy, disclose or rely on any information contained in this e-mail, and we would ask you to contact the sender immediately and delete the email from your system. Thank you. Macaulay Institute and Associated Companies, Macaulay Drive, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH. + + To post a message to the list, send it to ai-geostats@jrc.it + To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@ jrc.it with no subject and "unsubscribe ai-geostats" in the message body. DO NOT SEND Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list + As a general service to list users, please remember to post a summary of any useful responses to your questions. + Support to the forum can be found at http://www.ai-geostats.org/
