Dear Colleagues
Tuesday, 9 Feb. 2010
It is quite a while where our geostat mailing list is inactive. Let me
reactivate it by raising the following enquiry on geographical versus climate
regime boundary.
As a tradition, we used to base our spatial analysis on data collected from a
particular geographical boundary as opposed to climate regime boundary. Most
likely, this might have something to do with feasibility of obtaining data for
a particular province or .... It happends that we have a province in southern
part of our country where we have two totally different climate regimes. The
daily rainfall data collected inside the geographical boundary of this province
consists of 48 rain gauge stations. It makes a lot of sense to obtain two model
of spatial variabilities
for these two climate regimes. But, then one will be faced with a continuity
issues regarding points in between the two clusters. I was wondering if there
is any work being conducted to address:
1. Spatial analysis based on climate regime versus geographical boundary;
2. Continuity issues for two climate regimes within a single geographical
boundary.
Pointers to any documents, papers, contact persons, and ... would be greatly
appreciated.
Thanks
Abedini
