On Sun, February 8, 2009 22:02, Calvin Davis wrote: > Second is SECTOOL. This is more managable since I can do a check before > running the tool and an update afterwards. Again, it causes many ctime > changes. It would seem this is a totally unrequired function of the > application,
I agree with that last sentence. I believe the right approach is to complain about the changed ctimes with the Sectool developers, perhaps on [email protected] Regards, Richard van den Berg _______________________________________________ Aide mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.cs.tut.fi/mailman/listinfo/aide
