I think that sites should work for instance if on the same server will be sharism, OFLB and OCAL they will have different users, different domain and different widgets, they will need different $config.
So what benefit will we have when login can have "*". It look like templates (that I propose) to me, if the only thing that you want for them is display_url. If you want different widgets to belong to the same entity then you have Apps. Sites should be something bigger. And a question should all sites have the same admins, maybe there will be one user root that will configure All sites and ModuleGODs (or SiteAdmin) will have access to one site. On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:15:59 +0100 Roger Martín <[email protected]> wrote: > The two proposal can't be mixed. The problems is what is a site, or a > multi-site. > > A site is only certain output from the SAME data. For example: you > can have a frontpage, a backpage and > a rss feed. If you consider these as sites developing is easier: you > can use "*" in display_urls; a new widget in frontpage will not > affects other sites. You can easily controls access, deactivate one > site..,move sites, import, export. > and shares apps between sites. > > When i think in sites i don't think in wordpress.org: different blog > over the same hosting. That can be resolved with more money to > contract other hosting. > > I think, that moving admin,login and welcome to sites we can solve > some problems, but i don't want discuss again over this. Take a > decision. -- Jakub Jankiewicz twitter: @jcubic www: http://jcubic.pl _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~aikiframework-devel Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~aikiframework-devel More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
