So in this case it means I need to use command line svn to do checkout not
Eclipse built-in SVN browser as I could not figure out how to check out
parent direcotry in it (I may be missing an option for it)

In my opinion it would be better user/developer experience ot be able to
check out projects  from SVN in Eclispe - do we really need to have
ws-messaging parent? Moreover message box is an independent service from
message broker (it really is just a simple persistent event consumer with
API to retrieve stored events)

Thanks,

Alek

On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Jul 16, 2011, at 8:31 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake wrote:
>
> > Hi Alek,
> >
> > airavata/ws-messenger is considered as a single project so if you want to
> > build airavata/ws-messenger/messagebox you need to checkout
> > airavata/ws-messenger  and try to build with it. In airavata/ws-messenger
> is
> > having different build profiles, you can simply invoke
> > mvn clean install -Dmodule=messagebox
>
> Yes thats right.  As of now WS-Messenger is the parent for the three
> sub-components. But very soon we want to get a place where Airavata will be
> the parent and everything else will be modules.
>
> From within the ws-messenger, message box can also be built as: mvn clean
> install -f messagebox/pom.xml
>
> Suresh
>
>
> >
> > This will build only messagebox but still you need ws-messenger parent
> pom
> > to be there in your project.
> >
> > Regards
> > Lahiru
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Alek Slominski (Apache)
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I had no problems with building XBaya in Eclipse but I am having
> problems
> >> with MessageBox
> >>
> >> pom.xml has this problem: Project build error: Non-resolvable parent
> POM:
> >> Could not find artifact Airavata:ws-messenger:pom:0.0.**1-SNAPSHOT and
> >> 'parent.relativePath' points at wrong local POM
> >>
> >> does it mean that I need to do some special checkout from SVN to keep
> >> parent directory? Is that documented somewhere?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Alek
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to