Hi Patrik, Good morning news, I think a light framework like Aeron will be most welcome, UDP shouldn't be a problem as long as (as you mentioned) reliable delivery can be implemented/configured on top. About Netty 3 I don't understand what you are saying, akka-remote is already based on Netty 3 and the only thing I did on the Netty 3 side was to give them a PR to allow Netty 3 to use JDK 8 CHMv8, which would only benefit anything that is still based on Netty 3.
I do agree that going forward and trying to do anything else based on Netty will just be a waste of time and effort as it is not towards the final goal; if that was what you meant. Best regards, Guido. On Friday, March 18, 2016 at 9:47:00 AM UTC, Patrik Nordwall wrote: > > Hi all, > > A quick update of the roadmap for Akka Remoting. Lightbend's core Akka > team will be able to start working on a new implementation for Akka > Remoting next sprint, which starts April 4. We will then start with > describing the goals and overall design ideas and share with you. > > We are interested in something based on UDP, and Aeron > <https://github.com/real-logic/Aeron> looks promising, but we have not > decided anything yet. > > Do you think UDP is acceptable in most production environments? Of course > we would implement the message ordering and "reliable" delivery on top. > When is TCP required from an infrastructure perspective? > > Regarding the current Netty based implementation we would like to touch it > as little as possible to avoid risks of introducing new bugs. Therefore we > will not update to Netty 3. When we have a stable replacement the old > implementation will be removed. > > We are looking forward to working on this important area, and community > involvement is very much welcome. > > Cheers, > Patrik > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Guido Medina <oxy...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> In the meantime I can't stay idle so I started digging inside Netty 3 and >> at the moment I'm using my own Netty 3.10.6.Final (Not release yet) which >> replaces the Netty internal CHM (Was the one from JDK 5) >> There is a PR which most likely will be on 3.10.6.Final so be watching, I >> didn't bother to measure it, it should be slightly faster for JDK 7 or 8 >> but if anyone is curious just take Netty branch 3.10 and add my PR: >> >> https://github.com/netty/netty/pull/4905 >> >> I wish I was a Scala expert, maybe in few months ;-) >> >> HTH, >> >> Guido. >> >> -- >> >>>>>>>>>> Read the docs: http://akka.io/docs/ >> >>>>>>>>>> Check the FAQ: >> http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/current/additional/faq.html >> >>>>>>>>>> Search the archives: https://groups.google.com/group/akka-user >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Akka User List" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to akka-user+...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to akka...@googlegroups.com >> <javascript:>. >> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/akka-user. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > > > -- > > Patrik Nordwall > Akka Tech Lead > Lightbend <http://www.lightbend.com/> - Reactive apps on the JVM > Twitter: @patriknw > > [image: Lightbend] <http://www.lightbend.com/> > > -- >>>>>>>>>> Read the docs: http://akka.io/docs/ >>>>>>>>>> Check the FAQ: >>>>>>>>>> http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/current/additional/faq.html >>>>>>>>>> Search the archives: https://groups.google.com/group/akka-user --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Akka User List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to akka-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to akka-user@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/akka-user. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
