Hi everyone, I’ve got a requirement to run services on machines with limited resources, memory in particular, but also disk (disk == memory for my use case!) In addition, I wish to reduce the attack surface area of a service by eliminating code that isn’t used.
I’d therefore like to take a unikernal-style of approach to my services which, of course, use Akka. Using Proguard on my service very quickly revealed problems relating to Akka. From looking through past posts, it seems that the use of Proguard has been a discussion relating to Android (which also hasn’t helped me around the issues I’ve been having). Would there be any interest in seeing Akka become more suitable for dead code elimination, particularly with the advent of Akka Typed? (reflection and dead code elimination are at odds with each other) Having an official project declaration of what classes should be kept for dead code elimination, and an integration build verifying this to a degree is what I’m thinking. I’d be happy contribute a PR with a little help. Cheers C -- >>>>>>>>>> Read the docs: http://akka.io/docs/ >>>>>>>>>> Check the FAQ: >>>>>>>>>> http://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/current/additional/faq.html >>>>>>>>>> Search the archives: https://groups.google.com/group/akka-user --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Akka User List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to akka-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to akka-user@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/akka-user. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
