On 03/03/07, Matt Valerio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, that sounds like it could be the culprit. I'd have to dig into the > code more to know for sure. > > I propose that while we're looking into the problem we also investigate the > feasibility of migrating the custom collections to use .NET 2.0 generics. > Just a thought -- any objections?
I was going to suggest it myself - it will make things a lot easier for db4o storage, and the code should be quite a bit quicker. The current way of doing things feels quite rdbms to me, and objectifiying it can only be a good thing. Cheers Anton ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ alchemi-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alchemi-users
