Sam Ruby Writes: > dIon Gillard wrote: > >> I believe that the information that a pure bootstrapping approach > >> provides is quite valuable. > > I agree.
> >> I don't know how to get this dones across all of the various > >> codebases, but I am willing to do my part. Are there maven and/or > >> centipede developers out there who share this goal? > > I'm happy to do my part. > dIon, can you take a look at > http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-11-24/commons-vfs.html ? This > built successfully on 2002-11-20, but failed on 2002-11-21. Sure...I'm talking to Adam about how he managed to do it now :) > It seems that the build.xml is generated, and has a hardcoded path in it > that makes no sense on my Linux box. I could override it in the project > definition, but that too is generated and in the jakarta-commons/vfs cvs > tree. > One solution would be to correct the maven.xml and/or maven itself and > check in a corrected build.xml and/or gump.xml. Once I know what the cause is, I'll fix it in Maven. > Another solution would be to ignore the generated gump.xml and construct > one by hand that works, perhaps checking it into gump/project directory. > What would you suggest? I'd prefer that it gets fixed in Maven. > P.S. To compound this problem, there was a problem whereby the nag > messages were not being sent for this component. This is now fixed. Is this because of the descriptor? -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/Weblog Work: http://www.multitask.com.au -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
