El Viernes, 25 de Noviembre de 2005 21:59, Jeremy Huntwork escribió:

> Yes, that's good. :) Except that it would almost be better done as
> individual files, like:
>
> 028-gcc-pass1.configure
> 028-gcc-pass1.make
> 028-gcc-pass1.install
>
> So that they could be called and sent individually.


If the client send "execute glibc-pass1 install" no matter if that  "unpack" 
or "install" functions are defined on separate files or not.



-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:       http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com
TLDP-ES:                           http://es.tldp.org
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to