On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 17:25:09 -0500 Thomas Pegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip> > Now for the BLFS profile, this beast needs major work, but really we > need more hands to help with it, myself and Joachim just is not > enough anymore. This brings another question do we want to keep > maintaining this profile? BLFS is such a fast moving target it seems > a bit impossible currently. I personally would like to see it > continue, but I currently have no time to keep up with it anymore, my > plate is full enough with LFS and CLFS and I know Joachim's time is > limited. I think that until you can derive the profiles automatically from the book's xml source you will never have enough resources to keep up with BLFS. The profiles are considerably more complex than most (c)LFS ones, and they change in 'substance' more often (not just version numbers). R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
