El Miércoles, 24 de Mayo de 2006 02:59, George Boudreau escribió:
> The attached files (modified) are how I see the division of the code. I
> am still working my way through your design ideas but as far as I can
> tell this is a usable methodology. I can see it being called from
> {c,h}lfs and satisfying most peoples needs.
Actually, we will need to can call it from inside {c,h}lfs to can build at
least the packages blfs will depend on ;-)
> I did not want to commit the files before you had a chance to comment on
> my direction..
The directions looks good. Some suggestions:
- I will go to rewrite now the circular dependencies handler to make it more
functional. Instead of drooping all optional dependencies, just drop only the
affected one.
- To move generate_dependency_tree to func_dependencies
- To move generate_TARGET_xml, generate_target_book and create_build_scripts
to a new func_parser file.
- Soon we will need also a func_makefile file and maybe a separate
build-makefile.sh script. Thus subdirectories for function files and XSL
files could be needed to keep the working dir clean.
- Maybe do_dependencies could be splitted on small chunks.
Well, I will go to do the circular dependencies code change and let you to
think and work on all that.
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com
TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
