El Lunes, 16 de Octubre de 2006 19:35, George Boudreau escribió:
> Manuel,
> Do you see any weak points in method I used to add custom packages?
> It was a rush job and I may have missed some details.
Well, I'm now trying to add TRACKING_DIR into the equation, not all of us have
a /home/george directory ;-)
About the method, the scripts generation looks good, but maybe we could to use
for mk_CUSTOM_TOOLS something similar to what is used for mk_BLFS_TOOL. That
could make more easy the integration with other books.
Also, I would to know how that `cat tmp` magic command works :-?
> FYI
> I am looking at a method of including scripts that do not use package
> libraries and need their own Makefile entry generator.
What about
if [[ "x${PKG}" = "x" ]] ; then
no-package code (i.e, plain configuration file generation script)
else
code to build a package
fi
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info
TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
