El Martes, 17 de Octubre de 2006 23:08, Dan Nicholson escribió: > > Maybe I'm in the minority, but I think that's a useful goal. To me, it > seems like most of the editors are just following XSL convention > anyway. I.e., in BLFS we're adding role="root" because somebody said > to do it. If we were to start saying add role="install" and did the > initial mass changeover, I don't think anyone would have too big a > problem.
The basic problem is to develop the XML tags+attributes framework that would allow to extract the commands and packages info separated by type, without breaking validation and/or HTML/PDF output. Then show it to all books editors and hope that they agree with implementing the changes. The first point requires time to find a working and editor-friendly solution. The second point is an unknown variable and may depend on who and when the proposal is made. > Could you point me to some XSL documentation? Maybe some newbie level > stuff, too? This is my major stumbling block in mapping between book > and build. You guys are doing kick ass work on jhalfs, but I think > there's some lower level work that could be done to make it more > powerful without requiring lots of workarounds at the higher level. Well, I learn XSL/Xpath/Xpointer/CSS reading the W3C specifications and playing with the DocBook XSl code and books sources. I don't have in my bookmarks links to XSL manuals, but a quick search sow this ones: http://ils.unc.edu/~pottl/inls259/xml/xsl.html http://www.quepublishing.com/articles/article.asp?p=26312&rl=1 http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wsphelp/topic/com.ibm.etools.xsl.source.doc/tasks/tcrtxsl.htm -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
