El Viernes, 10 de Noviembre de 2006 23:39, Dan Nicholson escribió: > I don't agree. The whole reason that we put the #!/bin/sh shebang in > scripts is that we can expect a Posix compliant shell. What we're > doing here (I do this myself, too) is using Bash. Ubuntu ships with > Bash, just has sh->dash. So, we should stop fooling around and make > the shell we want bash instead of griping about what /bin/sh is. > There's no rule that says sh->bash. Or, go back through all the > scripts and make them fully Posix compliant. There's an easy solution > and a hard solution here.
Well, taking into account that the books expect that the host is running bash while building the system (~/.bash_profile is what is used to set up a sane environment) and that some book's commands may have bashims, I think that is better to invoke explicitly /bin/bash is all places where a shell is needed. I will do the changes in the XSL code now. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
