El Jueves, 15 de Febrero de 2007 22:59, Matthew Burgess escribió: > Personally, I consider forcing a particular shell to be used an ugly hack > :-)
And I see make not using the SHELL env user variable and forcing /bin/sh by default as a bug ;-) > > Like Dan pointed and my test seems confirm, should be enough removing > > that 3 occurrences of SHELL=/bin/bash and adding it to the top with the > > other Makefile variables settings. > > Well, after that fix is put in, That fix is now in trunk. > will you accept any patches that do > POSIX-ify the shell syntax piecemeal (i.e. so we can replace each of those > SHELL=/bin/bash settings one at a time)? That way we shouldn't break > anything, right? Well, tacking into account that all *LFS books have in their host prerequisites that Bash must be available and that must be the shell used by the builder user to set-up a sane environment, I don't see a real need to do jhalfs POSIX-compatible. But if you are willing to make such patch keeping availbables all current jhalfs features and extensions I will be happly aplying it. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
