George Boudreau wrote: > Other than your patch request there seemed to be zero interest in > jhalfs.
Well - people still try it on my LiveCD and complain on IRC. That's why the patch. > Jeremy had been making noises about reviving his c++ code and > turning nALFS into jhalfs replacement. JHALFS seems to have run out of > steam, Manuel and I have pushed this rock as far as we can, alone. There > was/is talk of integrating package management into jhalfs which would > require _more_ books mods and code changes (see the experimental > branch). I am not available for extensive code work until next year. I see. So, while jhalfs is a viable solution for LFS LiveCD 6.3, what (if anything ALFS-related at all) should be included on the development LFS LiveCD? -- Alexander E. Patrakov -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
