Le 11/01/2014 04:18, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : > Pierre Labastie wrote: >> Le 10/01/2014 00:08, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : >>> Pierre, >>> >>> In LFS, I want to add an instruction to chapter06/revisedchroot.xml >>> which is actually titled "Cleaning Up". When I tested jhalfs, >>> 129-revisedchroot is not run in the Makefile, but >>> lfs-commands/chapter06/129-revisedchroot is created. >>> >>> The revised 'chroot' command should not be run but the new 'rm' command >>> should be. I'd like to see a role="noauto" (or equivalent) for >>> <userinput> to skip the chroot command, but also run 129-revisedchroot >>> in the Makefile. >>> >>> Would that be hard to do? >>> >>> -- Bruce >>> >> I think I could try to do that during the week-end. The easy part is to run >> the script in the Makefile. The harder part is to split the script, because >> the chroot instruction is needed too (variable CHROOT2 in the Makefile), but >> of course should not be run when the script is run. So I think I'll split the >> script into 129-1-revisedchroot and 129-2-revisedchroot, use the -1 for >> extracting the chroot command and run the -2 in the Makefile. For >> discriminating the two strings, I do not think a special role="" attribute is >> needed, but I need to be sure that the new command to be run does not contain >> "chroot". Is that the case? > > Yes, that's the case, but it may be useful to have a general way to add > an instruction but not have jhalfs include it. That's what I had in > mind with the role attribute. Another thought is something like > role='comment' and have the instruction(s) in that code chunk preceded > with a #. > > -- Bruce > Why not use "role='nodump'"? It is enough for jhalfs.
Pierre -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
