Le 22/01/2014 06:42, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>> Le 21/01/2014 08:50, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
>>> It does need a change. In LFS/master.sh, the function do_housekeeping has:
>>>
>>> @-if [ -h \$(MOUNT_PT)/dev/shm ]; then \\
>>> link=\$\$(readlink \$(MOUNT_PT)/dev/shm); \\
>>> umount \$(MOUNT_PT)/\$\$link; \\
>>> unset link; \\
>>> else \\
>>> umount \$(MOUNT_PT)/dev/shm; \\
>>> fi
>>>
>>> That can be changed to simply:
>>>
>>> @-umount \$(MOUNT_PT)/run
>>>
>>> Here is my uncommitted diff:
>>>
>>> --- chapter09/reboot.xml (revision 10447)
>>> +++ chapter09/reboot.xml (working copy)
>>> @@ -87,16 +87,8 @@
>>> <para>Then unmount the virtual file systems:</para>
>>>
>>> <screen><userinput>umount -v $LFS/dev/pts
>>> -
>>> -if [ -h $LFS/dev/shm ]; then
>>> - link=$(readlink $LFS/dev/shm)
>>> - umount -v $LFS/$link
>>> - unset link
>>> -else
>>> - umount -v $LFS/dev/shm
>>> -fi
>>> -
>>> umount -v $LFS/dev
>>> +umount -v $LFS/run
>>> umount -v $LFS/proc
>>> umount -v $LFS/sys</userinput></screen>
>>>
>>> -- Bruce
>>>
>> I hope to do that tomorrow. Problem is that jhalfs should remain compatible
>> with former versions of the book, so I cannot just apply your patch, which
>> would try to umount a non mounted /run, wen using former versions of the
>> books.
>> I'll try something like:
>> if mountpoint -q /run; then umount /run; else <old instructions>; fi
> That sound fine to me.
>
> -- Bruce
>
Done at r3779
Pierre
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
