Personally I would like nothing other than Knuth's '72 article in Lectures on Computer Science, but even there you'd find the Master ambivalent when <<actually>> defining the term!
And I agree formalism is the only method to clear away the ambiguity. Kindly consider the example
Milton uses the word "Inferno" in poetic fashion that can be interpreted into many meanings.
But can you take any meaning other than the one stated in a statement like ...
char tmp [] = "Inferno\0";
Of course the quality of attempt is something to be analyzed here not the objective!
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
