[algogeeks] Re: Is there any better solution than 0(nlgn) ?

Wed, 02 Aug 2006 10:21:18 -0700

If you know the range of numbers, you can allocate an array of that size, and ...
are you satisfied with this?!!!

 
On 8/2/06, sathiya narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
yup thanx, is there any way other than hashing ? which should be better than O(nlgn)





, 133470973390.236450, 270};
int main(){m[2]--?m[0]*=4,m[1]*=5,main():printf(m);}

Don't attach in Microsoft (.DOC, .PPT) format
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to