Don't think such an assumption can be used. Its not possible for RR* == R*.
On 3/27/07, Dhruva Sagar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > RR*=R* is an assumption that is often made for conveniences in some books. > I don't quite beleive it to be correct either. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
