This is O(n^3) because of the goto statement (effectively you have replaced
a loop with goto :) I think.
Instead of neightbor in C, you can do a binary search.
This is what I could think of but it doesnt meet the problem's requiremen -
O(nlgn):
1) O(n^2logn) with O(1) space:)
Sort all 3 arrays. For each pair of a[i],b[j], binary search for
(0-(a[i]+b[j])) in C to see if its present.
2) O(n^2) with O(n) space
Same as above, but instead of binary search of 0-(a[1]+b[j]) on C, you put
all elements of C in a hash.
There must be some variation of merge sort to do it in nlgn, but Im not able
to see it :)

On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 12:39 AM, daizi sheng <daizish...@gmail.com> wrote:

> with all arrays sorted firstly, if you enumerate ai, bj in ascedning order,
> ck will be sure in descending order.
>
> foreach(ai in A)
>  ck = largest element in C
>  foreach(bj in B)
>    AGAIN:
>      if(ai + bj + ck == 0) algorithm over
>      if(ai + bj + ck > 0) ck change to its neighbor in C and goto AGAIN
>      if(ai + bj + ck < 0) continue checking next bj
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:10 PM, anilkumarmyla <anilkumarm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > No matter whatever i could think of, I am unable to do better than N^3
> >
> > @daizi sheng
> > I don't get your algorithm
> > "2. enumerate ai, bj both in ascending order,"
> > Will that really help ? In what way ?
> >
> > --
> >
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
> >
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
>
>

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.


Reply via email to